From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Feb 24 9:51:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from nova.fqdn.com (fqdn.com [204.138.49.210]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53BA537B491 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 09:51:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from greg@fqdn.com) Received: from tyan (greg [204.138.49.213]) by nova.fqdn.com (SGI-8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA49187 for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:39:07 -0500 (EST) From: "greg" To: "Freebsd-Questions" Subject: net.inet.ip.fw.dyn_max question. Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:50:01 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, something happened in my last letter.. sorry about that. This one has a subject and no ghost paste. I'm using IPFW's stateful features on our firewall. the only machine that will be making requests via it to the internet is the proxy server. There is about 500 users using the proxy server. is it ok to or necessary to increase the amount of dynamic rules that can exist at any one time from that of the default value? I have moved it up from 1000 to 2000 and was wondering if there will be any ramifications from doing so. The system has 196 megs of memory and a 400Mhz p2 cpu. take care, greg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message