From owner-freebsd-ports  Fri Oct 10 19:08:31 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA23882
          for ports-outgoing; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 19:08:31 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-ports)
Received: from bubble.didi.com (vader.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.38.234])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA23877;
          Fri, 10 Oct 1997 19:08:26 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from asami@bubble.didi.com)
Received: (from asami@localhost)
	by bubble.didi.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) id TAA02142;
	Fri, 10 Oct 1997 19:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 19:08:52 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199710110208.TAA02142@bubble.didi.com>
To: tg@ihf.rwth-aachen.de
CC: ports@freebsd.org, jfitz@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: <877mbliyy2.fsf@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> (message from Thomas Gellekum on 10 Oct 1997 14:29:09 +0200)
Subject: Re: SWIG vs. swig
From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami)
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

 * why do we have two ports for swig? SWIG seems to be older, swig
 * doesn't have an entry in devel/Makefile, so which one's the one?

swig was imported by mistake, the committer didn't notice the all-caps
one.  James, you need to delete devel/swig (cvs remove).

I also think someone was going to update SWIG to the latest version.

Satoshi