Date: Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:56:24 +0100 From: j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch) To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tape Backup Drive Not working. Message-ID: <Mutt.19970126205624.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> In-Reply-To: <199701261907.VAA25206@zeta.fidata.fi>; from Tomi Vainio on Jan 26, 1997 21:07:55 %2B0200 References: <10798.199701260129@pitcairn.cogsci.ed.ac.uk> <Mutt.19970126102705.j@uriah.heep.sax.de> <199701261907.VAA25206@zeta.fidata.fi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Tomi Vainio wrote: (Thanks for the feedback!) > > for the older 5099?). Does anybody have experiences with the Wangtek > > 5525ES? Does it claim to be SCSI-2 or SCSI-1? > > > (bt0:2:0): "WANGTEK 5525ES SCSI 70Z" type 1 removable SCSI 2 > st0(bt0:2:0): Sequential-Access density code 0x0, drive empty Hmm, i assume that's already one of the newer drives? > I have used this one since FreeBSD 2.0 and it has always worked > without any problems. Of course, but that wasn't my question. The question was whether it would continue to work with the PF bit set. Since your drive claims SCSI-2 conformance, it must work then. Anybody around with older drives? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Mutt.19970126205624.j>