Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 12:02:30 -0700 (PDT) From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: ru@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kqueued make(1): can someone try it for me please? Message-ID: <200408201902.i7KJ2UZf024130@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <20040820152748.GD92603@ip.net.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Date: Fri, 20 Aug 2004 18:27:48 +0300
>From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
>To: David Wolfskill <dhw@FreeBSD.org>
>Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
>Subject: kqueued make(1): can someone try it for me please?
>I'm interested in the change in buildworld times.
OK; this was with "make -j8 buildworld" on RELENG_5:
freebeast(5.3)[6] uname -a
FreeBSD freebeast.catwhisker.org 5.3-ALPHA FreeBSD 5.3-ALPHA #56: Fri Aug 20 07:26:27 PDT 2004 root@freebeast.catwhisker.org:/common/S3/obj/usr/src/sys/FREEBEAST i386
freebeast(5.3)[7]
Before patch to make/Makefile:
1h8m1.67s real 1h33m11.20s user 24m25.74s sys
After patch to make/Makefile:
1h8m5.90s real 1h33m4.93s user 24m13.26s sys
Before each test, I rebooted, then cleared /usr/obj/usr/src, then re-built
and -installed /usr/bin/make.
I did botch the patch the first time (by leaving a "3D" in there), but
the timing wasn't started until after the patch was done, so that should
not be especially significant.
Each test was done within script(1), within screen(1). I cleaned up
the script files a little, and can make them available to you in whole
or in part.
Peace,
david
--
David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org
Evidence of curmudgeonliness: becoming irritated with the usage of the
word "speed" in contexts referring to quantification of network
performance, as opposed to "bandwidth" or "latency."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200408201902.i7KJ2UZf024130>