Date: Tue, 02 Aug 2005 08:53:24 -0600 (MDT) From: "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> To: des@des.no Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, netchild@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, ru@FreeBSD.ORG, grehan@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src Makefile.inc1 ObsoleteFiles.inc src/share/man/man7 build.7 Message-ID: <20050802.085324.113101750.imp@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <86d5owikzx.fsf@xps.des.no> References: <20050802090717.GK14023@ip.net.ua> <20050802140536.zstn68rcgsg84g0w@netchild.homeip.net> <86d5owikzx.fsf@xps.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <86d5owikzx.fsf@xps.des.no>
des@des.no (Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav) writes:
: Alexander Leidinger <netchild@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: > Warner said it's unlikely that someone will use this feature in a c=
ross-arch
: > situation (at least I did understand it this way), so what about wa=
iting
: > until we get user-feedback for this case?
: =
: Just because Warner doesn't need this feature doesn't mean nobody els=
e
: does.
I didn't say I didn't need this feature. I suggested it might be
relatively rare that someone uses it in cross-arch cases. Besides, it
will do the right thing if we use TARGET_ARCH.
Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050802.085324.113101750.imp>