From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Feb 12 20:47:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from quack.kfu.com (quack.kfu.com [205.178.90.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E2037B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:47:11 -0800 (PST) Received: from morpheus.kfu.com (morpheus.kfu.com [205.178.90.230]) by quack.kfu.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1D4lAv66773 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:47:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from nsayer@mailhost.kfu.com) Received: by morpheus.kfu.com (8.11.1//ident-1.0) id f1D4l9L71942; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:47:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:47:09 -0800 (PST) From: nsayer@quack.kfu.com Message-Id: <200102130447.f1D4l9L71942@morpheus.kfu.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: /usr/local/lib/win32 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have successfully created a port for the xmps-win32-plugin stuff. Actually, I just copied the one for the opendivx plugin and changed the name, but that's neither here nor there. :-) This brings up an issue I'm not sure what to do about before committing the port. /usr/local/lib/win32 is currently populated by the avifile port. xmps-win32- plugin uses the codecs but does not use anything else in avifile. This argues strongly for making the WIN32 codecs into their own port and having both avifile and the xmps-win32-plugin ports depend on this new child port (which perhaps should go into the emulators category?). What does everyone think about this situation? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message