Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:38:13 -0700
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Cc:        jamiE rishaw - master e*tard <jamiE@arpa.com>, Tom <tom@uniserve.com>, Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>, freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, security-officer@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: bugtraq posts: stream.c - new FreeBSD exploit? 
Message-ID:  <4.2.2.20000120173540.01a26100@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <200001210034.RAA06762@harmony.village.org>
References:  <Your message of "Thu, 20 Jan 2000 17:32:03 MST." <4.2.2.20000120172607.0198f1e0@localhost> <4.2.2.20000120172607.0198f1e0@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.02A.10001201232520.26367-100000@shell.uniserve.ca> <3.0.5.32.20000120152818.01d7fa40@staff.sentex.ca> <Pine.BSF.4.02A.10001201232520.26367-100000@shell.uniserve.ca>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hmmm. I haven't started at the stack to see if this is feasible,
but can't the code that implements IPFW's "established" keyword
be used to discard the ACK if it isn't associated with an
active session?

--Brett

At 05:34 PM 1/20/2000 , Warner Losh wrote:
   
>It is a remote exploit.
>
>Warner



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.2.20000120173540.01a26100>