Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 24 Apr 2013 20:01:45 +0000 (UTC)
From:      Walter Hurry <walterhurry@gmail.com>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD-update?
Message-ID:  <kl9dn9$vrb$2@ger.gmane.org>
References:  <kl8vjf$nll$1@ger.gmane.org> <20130424203430.e127c9a56fe88f968eed6ad5@sohara.org> <op.wv19hfhe34t2sn@tech304.office.supranet.net>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:52:17 -0500, Mark Felder wrote:

> On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 14:34:30 -0500, Steve O'Hara-Smith
> <steve@sohara.org> wrote:
> 
>> You have updated to 9.1-RELEASE-p2 - but since there have been no
>> kernel changes since 9.1-RELEASE the kernel version message hasn't
>> changed.
>> This could very reasonably be regarded as bug in the update/version
>> reporting process but I wouldn't hold my breath for a fix, as things
>> stand the version reported only changes when the kernel is updated, or
>> if you recompile it after the update.
> 
> It would be nice if the version of the OS itself was stored in something
> like /etc/freebsd-version so you know what the version of the OS as a
> whole is. I'd even accept some sort of output by freebsd-update. It just
> seems silly that there's no other way -- kern.osrelease is just the base
> release and kern.version is the same thing that uname -a outputs. It's
> hard to pick this up and monitor it accurately.

I think I agree with this. It's somewhat confusing for a novice like me.

Thanks to all for the helpful replies.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?kl9dn9$vrb$2>