Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 10:04:07 -0600 From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> To: ulf@alameda.net Cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kern/146287: [ciss] ciss(4) cannot see more than one SmartArray controller Message-ID: <F4B88810-2F17-4902-8325-432B4FC08F8E@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <20100505155946.GL30353@evil.alameda.net> References: <201005041800.o44I08d4017511@freefall.freebsd.org> <E860C0FC-EB64-4001-9BE4-C74075DB0D57@samsco.org> <4BE06F10.5080904@intersonic.se> <32244F4E-DAF3-4CC0-B178-32B30076A0D5@samsco.org> <4BE083B8.6070402@intersonic.se> <20100505155946.GL30353@evil.alameda.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On May 5, 2010, at 9:59 AM, Ulf Zimmermann wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2010 at 10:29:44PM +0200, Per olof Ljungmark wrote: >> Scott Long wrote: >>> Ah, I see a problem where the ACPI driver is rejecting the bridge >>> that the 2 extra controllers are on. This machine is likely 7-8 >>> years old, yes? Disabling ACPI from the freebsd boot menu or from >>> the BIOS. Also check if there are any BIOS/firmware upgrades >>> available for the machine. >>>=20 >>> Scott >>=20 >> A G4 should be around five years I think, the last U320 equipped = ProLiant's. >=20 > DL380 g4 was retired January 31 2007. >=20 >>=20 >> Moving the 6400 card to the slot closest to the MB fixed it. There is = a >> great deal of confusion in HP's docs on slot numbering and such and >> although I did not find such information I suspect the controller = should >> go inte this slot even if it's pictured in slot two in the manual. >=20 > There were 3 different cages for the expanasion cards available. = Non-hotswap > PCI-X, Hotswap PCI-X and PCI-Express. I don't remember on the G4, but = on the G3 > the cage was bottom slot 133Mhz and not hotswap, while the top two = were > slower, but hotswap. That could mean different PCI bridge chip. >=20 Right, there's a PCIX bridge that is failing to attach, leaving the bus = and devices behind it invisible. I believe that the failure is because = the bridge is seen in the PCI register scan, but not in the ACPI AML. = Because it's not in the AML, the acpi_pcib driver vetos the attach. I = believe that if the machine was booted with ACPI disabled, all of the = bridges+buses+devices would be seen regardless of what slots they are = in. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F4B88810-2F17-4902-8325-432B4FC08F8E>