Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2007 08:06:29 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: gnn@freebsd.org Cc: current@freebsd.org, net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FAST_IPSEC import to HEAD is imminent.. Message-ID: <24957.1182931589@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:38:21 %2B0900." <m2fy4du9si.wl%gnn@neville-neil.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Can I ask a really fundamental question: Names like "newbus", "SMPng", "FAST_IPSEC" and similar grow really silly over time, because the attribute they carry in their name gets outdated. Once FAST_IPSEC replaces IPSEC, what is it faster than ? Can we please drop the FAST_ prefix along with the old IPSEC when we get to that point ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24957.1182931589>