Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 14:33:14 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Is Yahoo! moving from FreeBSD? Message-ID: <176516442.20050225143314@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <89b41e47050225045140823818@mail.gmail.com> References: <eeef1a4c050223074232167e2d@mail.gmail.com> <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNAEIDFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <89b41e4705022407542f4feaa9@mail.gmail.com> <89b41e470502240834ba670b1@mail.gmail.com> <89b41e470502250015dc17b80@mail.gmail.com> <528192452.20050225131057@wanadoo.fr> <89b41e47050225045140823818@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel writes: > my scenario was this: i'm a big company and i use FreeBSD coz it > suites best for my needs; let's say among others that my/a programming > team built something on top of it ; > because i want the system to work as flawless as possible i pay a > monthly fee for support - say some 4 to 6 figures of dollars; would i > care what you do with the money? i think not; i'm only interested that > you'll be there (in place) whenever i need, whenever i get some freaky > error.... Maybe, but for the company providing the support, it has an interest in creating as many bugs as possible, in order to generate more support revenue. Some companies have actually fallen into this trap. They try to convert support functions into profit centers instead of cost centers, and in so doing they create serious conflicts of interest. The same problem exists for companies that provide both free/low-cost support and highly-paid consulting services. There's a tendency to push support issues off to the consultants and try to bill the customer for consulting fees in order to fix what is actually a bug. It's not very ethical but I've seen it happen often enough. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?176516442.20050225143314>