Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2020 13:06:55 -0700 From: Don Wilde <dwilde1@gmail.com> To: Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: swap space issues Message-ID: <8e833afe-d28a-3cc6-983c-cd5eed88ad20@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAJuc1zO1uyv0Uoo3AJL=ZCy9vD-nvaZUpSVR60z6bJyACrOenA@mail.gmail.com> References: <202007120628.06C6SfNB015907@sdf.org> <3afe4d2f-3b1e-a1c5-f947-5f57800317a6@gmail.com> <CAJuc1zO1uyv0Uoo3AJL=ZCy9vD-nvaZUpSVR60z6bJyACrOenA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 7/12/20 12:39 PM, Jonathan Chen wrote: [snip] > With synth you can reduce the number of workers to just "1" (ie: > Number_of_builders=1), if you just want your ports-build to complete > without any stress. However, one of the reasons why I use synth is > _because_ of the stress it can place on my 12-STABLE snapshots. If the > system is stable and performs well when under load, I feel just that > bit more assured about using it in production environments. > > My 2 cents. Yeah, I did that. Problem was a bad update to a port, had mismatched bracket element so blew the stack. Same thing happened with one worker, one task. Made sure I didn't use that port again... ;-) -- Don Wilde **************************************************** * What is the Internet of Things but a system * * of systems including humans? * ****************************************************
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8e833afe-d28a-3cc6-983c-cd5eed88ad20>