Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:30:12 -0500
From:      Jung-uk Kim <jkim@niksun.com>
To:        cvs-src@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org
Cc:        Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Subject:    Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC
Message-ID:  <200503181530.12815.jkim@niksun.com>
In-Reply-To: <20050318201540.GF54333@dragon.NUXI.org>
References:  <200503162023.j2GKNWnJ099551@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050317121651.N72560@delplex.bde.org> <20050318201540.GF54333@dragon.NUXI.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 18 March 2005 03:15 pm, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:37:15PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > Are the comments on precedence even correct?
>
> Yes.
>
> > I think precedence according to ordering in the config file
> > hasn't worked for many years.  PCI devices may (should) have
> > precedence over ISA ones, but that is a general property and
> > should be expressed better.
>
> There are both PCI lnc and pcn devices.  lnc and pcn can both
> attempt to attach to the same device -- we have code that tries to
> get the two drivers to live piecefully side-by-side.

Why can't we just remove if_lnc_pci.c?

Just a thought...

Jung-uk Kim



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503181530.12815.jkim>