Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:30:12 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim <jkim@niksun.com> To: cvs-src@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Cc: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf GENERIC src/sys/amd64/conf GENERIC Message-ID: <200503181530.12815.jkim@niksun.com> In-Reply-To: <20050318201540.GF54333@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200503162023.j2GKNWnJ099551@repoman.freebsd.org> <20050317121651.N72560@delplex.bde.org> <20050318201540.GF54333@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday 18 March 2005 03:15 pm, David O'Brien wrote: > On Thu, Mar 17, 2005 at 12:37:15PM +1100, Bruce Evans wrote: > > Are the comments on precedence even correct? > > Yes. > > > I think precedence according to ordering in the config file > > hasn't worked for many years. PCI devices may (should) have > > precedence over ISA ones, but that is a general property and > > should be expressed better. > > There are both PCI lnc and pcn devices. lnc and pcn can both > attempt to attach to the same device -- we have code that tries to > get the two drivers to live piecefully side-by-side. Why can't we just remove if_lnc_pci.c? Just a thought... Jung-uk Kim
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200503181530.12815.jkim>