Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:50:07 +0100 From: krad <kraduk@gmail.com> To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" <steve@sohara.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>, aurfalien <aurfalien@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Proper way to share ZFS via NFS Message-ID: <CALfReyet59ZLE67X2N-=zg%2BVTp8sQmZc6pOq%2B8xLNe2wwHwY7A@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20130910193945.b10d9cc791748e030226a76a@sohara.org> References: <DFD7FF97-6F1F-40D9-AF6D-C151E216779A@gmail.com> <20130909152239.05eff4e8daf98d0659636dec@sohara.org> <CALfReyfONwS67JO540EMxnLFutXrt=N_xs49bi2GmV%2BLRCoPEw@mail.gmail.com> <20130910193945.b10d9cc791748e030226a76a@sohara.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
If you cant cope with multiple operating systems and their differences you are probably in the wrong job. On 10 September 2013 19:39, Steve O'Hara-Smith <steve@sohara.org> wrote: > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 12:10:13 +0100 > krad <kraduk@gmail.com> wrote: > > > which is why you shouldnt use /etc/exports for zfs datasets. Just because > > Not so clear, if you are using a mixture of filesystems you may > very sensibly opt to keep all your export controls in one place, similarly > if you have servers running multiple OSs then not having to remember that > the FreeBSD/ZFS box manages it's exports differently to the Linux/ext2fs > may well be a benefit. You may have management tools and not wish to extend > them to handle ZFS explicitly. > > There can be good reasons both ways. > > -- > Steve O'Hara-Smith | Directable Mirror Arrays > C:>WIN | A better way to focus the sun > The computer obeys and wins. | licences available see > You lose and Bill collects. | http://www.sohara.org/ >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CALfReyet59ZLE67X2N-=zg%2BVTp8sQmZc6pOq%2B8xLNe2wwHwY7A>