From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 09:48:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3A31065673 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:48:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B4D18FC16 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:48:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o8R9muhN039697; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:48:56 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:48:56 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: c0re In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20100927193740.Q90633@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfw.ko and IPFIREWALL_FORWARD in GENERIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:48:58 -0000 On Mon, 27 Sep 2010, c0re wrote: > Is there any possibility to see IPFIREWALL_FORWARD option for ipfw.ko > in GENERIC? > Were there any patches about that? > I like freebsd-update, but lacking IPFIREWALL_FORWARD in GENERIC stops > me from using freebsd-update. In a nutshell, no. This thread covers why not .. or at least, not yet: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw/2010-March/004148.html cheers, Ian