From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon Oct 13 12:12:27 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id MAA16195 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 12:12:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers) Received: from elvis.vnet.net (elvis.vnet.net [166.82.1.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA16189 for ; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 12:12:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rivers@dignus.com) Received: from ponds.dignus.com (ponds.vnet.net [166.82.177.48]) by elvis.vnet.net (8.8.5/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA05076; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 14:58:06 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lakes.dignus.com (lakes [10.0.0.3]) by ponds.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA01223; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 15:13:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from rivers@localhost) by lakes.dignus.com (8.8.5/8.6.9) id PAA02525; Mon, 13 Oct 1997 15:03:52 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 13 Oct 1997 15:03:52 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas David Rivers Message-Id: <199710131903.PAA02525@lakes.dignus.com> To: brian@firehouse.net, rivers@dignus.com Subject: RE: C2 Trusted FreeBSD? Cc: dcarmich@mcs.com, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Shimon@i-Connect.Net Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > On Mon, 13 Oct 1997, Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > > > > Simon Shapiro writes:> > > > > > > Hi Douglas Carmichael; On 13-Oct-97 you wrote: > > > > Could FreeBSD be made to comply with B1 or C2 trusted system standards > > > > FOR REAL (unlike NT that can only comply when not hooked up to a > > > > network)? > > > > > > Last I checked (looooong time ago), Unix had the same problem. TCP/IP was, > > > at the time, inhenerntly un-Orangable. > > > > > > > Hmmm.. Data General has a variant of DG/UX which is at least B1 (if not > > C2...) Does anyone know the details there? Perhaps I can dig up some > > old contacts and find out what they did with this issue. > > > > - Dave Rivers - > > > > > > Do they? > > Last I checked, it had not been out of evaluation yet. Has this changed? > It wasnt on the NSA page as of a few weeks ago. > > > > Wow! I know they started working on it around 1989/1990 - if it hasn't gotten out of validation yet, that says a lot... - Dave Rivers -