From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 16 20:52:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D883A5 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:52:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22b.google.com (mail-ob0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE3BF20D0 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f171.google.com with SMTP id tb18so2571363obb.16 for ; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:52:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=s6TJdN+lkF7Q9bi/3M9QZvXxSDvxbDJI/6zBtfhDbZw=; b=ngJiMRNUpiKxdTjJw+UFos0luGolAOQZfA8IE4KkqzMBelUOhhc4IIXPzok3IulMk4 PVp2zDdg3spJNDV75mxvtddeKPYmL4J7B+EoSUjO/CarNNuFdBZCBOrLuccflspoeYOU hsoDWU2WR+tC1K4+yVDl4zIkVxdQqyJhfFoACoCx8ood5CJfZRo52bvpzXy1X2o+XeYh 0bwMlpaOpc2lk6bxLpNF6XSZfYMqBBEO/uDB/V/oiAoN9vO1tXAslDagV/TGGF40zkmp /BwwrPKmpyNDRu/d/hw2wmOwrKhtM5/49J/aLJ9sd/LwfobveLEeE73M8sL3/pEGfVlK 99Tg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.106.4 with SMTP id gq4mr2945553obb.4.1376686336244; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:52:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.2.110 with HTTP; Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:52:16 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <520E325B.2090804@omnilan.de> References: <51D90B9B.9080209@ixsystems.com> <51D92826.1070707@freebsd.org> <51E1061F.3050804@ixsystems.com> <51E398F3.40008@freebsd.org> <51E3EEAA.3040106@freebsd.org> <51E3EFA8.1050606@ixsystems.com> <20130715141300.GA1986@glenbarber.us> <51E41419.3040503@ixsystems.com> <520E325B.2090804@omnilan.de> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:52:16 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: status of autotuning freebsd for 9.2 From: Outback Dingo To: Harald Schmalzbauer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2013 20:52:17 -0000 On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Harald Schmalzbauer < h.schmalzbauer@omnilan.de> wrote: > Bez=C3=BCglich Pascal Drecker's Nachricht vom 16.07.2013 21:42 (localtim= e): > > ... > > >>>> IMHO, this is considered a new feature, and not a critical bug > > fix. re@ > > >>> asked from the start of the code slush to avoid new features, an= d > > at > > >>> this point, it is too late. It is not worth introducing possible > > >>> regressions, which will only delay the 9.2-RELEASE. > > >>> > > >>> Glen > > >>> > > >>> OK, then we need a release notes telling people a sane value for > > >> nmbclusters and friends so that they know how to make 10gigE work= . > > >> > > >> I'll poll my team for a value if someone else has one, that would > be > > even > > >> better. > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Alfred Perlstein > > >> VP Software Engineering, iXsystems > > > > > > > > >Is there a possibility that a separate unofficial patch set could b= e > > >released for people who want the autotuning but do not want to run = 9 > > >stable after 9.2 is released. > > >I would like the autotuning, but i am a little reluctent to use oth= er > > >stable stuff i will get when tracking stable. > > > > > >Regards > > >Johan > > > > Hi, > > > > I think that's a good point. > > > > In our company, it=EF=BF=BDs not allowed to use the stable tree for = any > > production system. Little and useful patches are still allowed. > > > > Having a central point with a description of each patch it would be > > much easier to update the release version with the needed patches. > > You're welcome using my "deploy-tools" patchsets. > I'm deploying RELENG only, but with local patchset-policy. Originally, > these are automtically handled during build-process with deploy-tools, > but of course you can selective/manually apply the desired patches from > the "local-patches" directory: > > ftp://ftp.omnilan.de/pub/FreeBSD/OmniLAN/deploy-tools/ > > Best regards, > > can you maybe define what exactly, this is and or where the specific patches are derived? Ive seen the autotune but whats the rest in here?? > -Harry > >