Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 05 Feb 2006 16:45:34 +0100
From:      des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=)
To:        Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        arch@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Message-ID:  <867j89n71d.fsf@xps.des.no>
In-Reply-To: <20060205084813.GN21806@wombat.fafoe.narf.at> (Stefan Farfeleder's message of "Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:48:15 %2B0100")
References:  <20060204211357.GD7604@ip.net.ua> <20060204.143353.109955782.imp@bsdimp.com> <86fymyn5il.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060204.155856.39766510.imp@bsdimp.com> <20060205084813.GN21806@wombat.fafoe.narf.at>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stefan Farfeleder <stefanf@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> On Sat, Feb 04, 2006 at 03:58:56PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > This driver wants to access these structures as arrays of uint32_t.
> > It used to cast directly, but that isn't allowed.  So, I've passed
> > the cast through a (void *).  Is that allowed?  Eg:
> >=20
> > 	struct foo foo;
> > 	((uint32_t *)(void *)&foo)[3] =3D 12;
> >=20
> > is that OK?
> I'm afraid that only silences the warning without solving the underlying
> problem.  I don't think there's a Standard conforming way to treat a
> struct foo as an uint32_t array.

A union should do the trick.

DES
--=20
Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?867j89n71d.fsf>