Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2001 14:33:31 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@svzserv.kemerovo.su> To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG, security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NOARP - gateway must answer and have frozen ARP table Message-ID: <3C11C24B.A980A646@svzserv.kemerovo.su> References: <20011205124430.A83642@svzserv.kemerovo.su> <20011205040316.H40864@blossom.cjclark.org> <20011205231735.A1361@grosbein.pp.ru> <20011205193859.B79705@sunbay.com> <200112051835.fB5IZqH95521@whizzo.transsys.com> <20011205204526.B89520@sunbay.com> <200112051852.fB5IqmH95809@whizzo.transsys.com> <20011205121928.A3061@blossom.cjclark.org> <200112062059.MAA02282@windsor.research.att.com> <20011207110542.J13705@sunbay.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> OK, I have a proposal that should fit both opinions. I'll keep the > net.link.ether.inet.static_arp to mean what it means now (keep ARP > table static, no updates except from local process through a routing > socket writes), and will add another sysctl that will switch the > meaning of IFF_NOARP from "no arp" to "static arp on this interface". > How about this? This would be the best souliution at least for us :-) Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3C11C24B.A980A646>