From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 29 08:55:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E879A16A4CE for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:55:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk (pfepc.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4FB643D53 for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 08:55:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from esbjerg@xbsd.net) Received: from xbsd.net (0x50a16596.boanxx13.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [80.161.101.150]) by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2A292628DF for ; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 17:55:40 +0100 (CET) Received: by xbsd.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 54EDB3DF34; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 17:55:40 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 17:55:40 +0100 From: Sven Esbjerg To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031229165540.GI24456@gosling.home.xbsd.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Re: 4.9-stable to 5.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 16:55:45 -0000 On Mon, Dec 29, 2003 at 08:43:03AM -0800, Randy Bush wrote: > i am running -stable on a thinkpad t40p. the thing won't resume > (looks like ata interrupt loss), no ath driver, ... and i have > time over the holidaze to try 5.x. two questions > > o can i just do the normal upgrade as described in UPDATING > (cvsup, buildworld, kernel, installworld, ...) from 4.9 to > 5.2RC in one leap? I would backup my data and start from scratch. So many things has changed. One of the more importen is the filesystem change from UFS to UFS2 which requires a newfs. Please note that 5.x is not as stable as 4.x or at least should be. If your laptop crashes due to buggy apm support 5.x might be a better choice. Please note might. Regards Sven Esbjerg -- http://www.usenet.dk/netikette - på forhånd tak.