Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 04:23:23 +0100 (CET) From: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> To: eischen@vigrid.com (Daniel Eischen) Cc: jasone@canonware.com, culverk@wam.umd.edu, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: the nist port Message-ID: <199912290323.EAA40047@freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: <199912290018.TAA22761@pcnet1.pcnet.com> from Daniel Eischen at "Dec 28, 1999 07:18:10 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems Daniel Eischen wrote: > > They're in sys/unistd.h, which is included by unistd.h. That should be > > just fine, and that location appears to be consistent with our other POSIX > > macro definitions. > > Ahh, good. I didn't have them because I wasn't up to date. > > So the question is now, why wasn't the nist port picking them up? Because unistd.h is not included as linux/solaris/etc doesn't need that. I've put in yet another ifdef __FreeBSD__ to deal with it, sigh.... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912290323.EAA40047>