Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Dec 1999 04:23:23 +0100 (CET)
From:      Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
To:        eischen@vigrid.com (Daniel Eischen)
Cc:        jasone@canonware.com, culverk@wam.umd.edu, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: the nist port
Message-ID:  <199912290323.EAA40047@freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: <199912290018.TAA22761@pcnet1.pcnet.com> from Daniel Eischen at "Dec 28, 1999 07:18:10 pm"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > They're in sys/unistd.h, which is included by unistd.h.  That should be
> > just fine, and that location appears to be consistent with our other POSIX
> > macro definitions.
> 
> Ahh, good.  I didn't have them because I wasn't up to date.
> 
> So the question is now, why wasn't the nist port picking them up?

Because unistd.h is not included as linux/solaris/etc doesn't need that.

I've put in yet another ifdef __FreeBSD__ to deal with it, sigh....

-Søren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199912290323.EAA40047>