From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Dec 28 19:23:55 1999
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from freebsd.dk (freebsd.dk [212.242.42.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76F71500A
	for <freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 28 Dec 1999 19:23:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from sos@freebsd.dk)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id EAA40047;
	Wed, 29 Dec 1999 04:23:23 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from sos)
From: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <199912290323.EAA40047@freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: the nist port
In-Reply-To: <199912290018.TAA22761@pcnet1.pcnet.com> from Daniel Eischen at "Dec 28, 1999 07:18:10 pm"
To: eischen@vigrid.com (Daniel Eischen)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 1999 04:23:23 +0100 (CET)
Cc: jasone@canonware.com, culverk@wam.umd.edu,
	freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

It seems Daniel Eischen wrote:
> > They're in sys/unistd.h, which is included by unistd.h.  That should be
> > just fine, and that location appears to be consistent with our other POSIX
> > macro definitions.
> 
> Ahh, good.  I didn't have them because I wasn't up to date.
> 
> So the question is now, why wasn't the nist port picking them up?

Because unistd.h is not included as linux/solaris/etc doesn't need that.

I've put in yet another ifdef __FreeBSD__ to deal with it, sigh....

-Søren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message