Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2017 20:04:35 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: Luca Pizzamiglio <luca.pizzamiglio@gmail.com> Cc: Jan Beich <jbeich@freebsd.org>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qemu-aarch64-static Message-ID: <db3b26b9-fca9-3ce9-7e33-6cc16452e51b@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <CAB88xy_bvpRRsBHOW6hg13RTACHkc9juMrjEBMW7NRunw_UExg@mail.gmail.com> References: <29906b14-8efa-ba65-985a-fd5b90c76b9b@netfence.it> <fucq-0zjk-wny@FreeBSD.org> <cc27572c-22c8-f5b2-6c2d-e563751d6423@netfence.it> <CAB88xy_bvpRRsBHOW6hg13RTACHkc9juMrjEBMW7NRunw_UExg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/22/17 18:03, Luca Pizzamiglio wrote: > yes, the qemu emulation of other architecture means that the CPU is > emulated by software, that's really expensive. > You should consider around 10x slower or even more. ccache can help a > lot in this case. Thanks. So you are confirming my poudriere is running an ARM compiler to produce ARM code? What's the use of "-x" when creating a jail then? What role does the "native cross-toolchain" play? I understood that would mean running an AMD64 compiler to cross-build ARM code... and thought that its timings would be comparable to native building. Is that wrong? bye & Thanks av.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?db3b26b9-fca9-3ce9-7e33-6cc16452e51b>