Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2013 17:17:34 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Subject: Re: question on bhyve + 9-stable Message-ID: <50E62DAE.4060809@mu.org> In-Reply-To: <50E62AAB.4050906@callfortesting.org> References: <50E06701.7070409@mu.org> <50E07436.4040105@freebsd.org> <50E24D2F.4000604@mu.org> <50E4AEE1.2080505@freebsd.org> <50E4B040.1040809@mu.org> <50E4B491.9010804@freebsd.org> <50E4BA7F.3060103@mu.org> <50E62AAB.4050906@callfortesting.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 1/3/13 5:04 PM, Michael Dexter wrote: > On 1/2/13 2:53 PM, Alfred Perlstein wrote: >> While the directions you and the rest of the bhyve developers put >> together were clear, comprehensive and well written... they still are a >> bit daunting for your average user... > > There-in is the challenge. You can try bhyve with simply a special > snapshot and yes, user's will soon have it by default. Creating guests > however opens up a can of worms of opportunities to tailor them to > your needs. jail(8) is the same in this regard. I am however talking > to Kris about integrating bhyve into PC-BSD's Warden so that there can > be at least one turn-key experience out there. > Yes, but please in no way take my comments as a reflection on the bhyve project. The only issues I had were just due to that it has not been integrated into head yet. I guess we may be stuck due to binutils for a while? I am not sure. -Alfred
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?50E62DAE.4060809>