From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Apr 16 13:58:27 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C49501065672; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3D68FC0C; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:58:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so3836209bwz.13 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:58:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=cE2Byk7dOP68o/aCNxKloHtRSU80+qMZ1x0GyAGTGe4=; b=J9w7Uc43hdMAbaGnkd2LRzEGEcDVWZgcpeAb33ynrlSZUUGnii/oXWnLpSteDHZmJm 5frdC1UpB+fhsYrXK53fJyNhoD0gbzIlDLpsDo0Mdbq48Qj+G+duzEJ/ZjAEOzad5aM9 R+XLcKb4NotNDMgUgtCSep/tDL23InSfLNLww= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; b=MwM2OXlAT6Hxs+grQ80P6Mi7c0UDTdwW73N+fjI6xUxwX511y1q519VPsD4ivnKYDw PFXRdFN5FLzi42Ciua0pY0Ywjze1O6oQk7IkQ+vMcWZWf3HUDA6SauDMuMN7z+oQU4Hl C6FChv89+QMLxml4mgxXeTl3z0JdkEKYqbegM= Received: by 10.204.84.5 with SMTP id h5mr2397696bkl.201.1302962305351; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:58:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.119.201 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 06:57:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20110413215728.17370cfa.artur@unix.net.pl> From: Chris Rees Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 14:57:55 +0100 Message-ID: To: Steven Kreuzer , Roman Bogorodskiy , artur@unix.net.pl, Erwin Lansing , FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: PearPC port broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 13:58:27 -0000 On 15 April 2011 19:28, Chris Rees wrote: > On 15 April 2011 18:41, Steven Kreuzer wrote: >> I just ran pearpc through a 8.2 amd64 tinderbox and it bombed out. >> Looks like whatever is causing it not to compile in 8 has been fixed >> in 9. We can change the port so thats its only marked as broken if the >> OS is not >= 9 >> > > Looks fine for me too, on 8.2-RELEASE [1]. > > Erwin, you marked it BROKEN, but I can't find any error logs, and > portsmon's drawing a blank.... could it have been transient? > > I'm running it through a tinderbox now on 7.4 [2]. > > Chris > Mystery solved-- missing dependency on nasm. I'll run it again and submit a patch. Chris [1] http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/tinderlogs/pearpc-f7.4.html