Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 14 Jul 2020 11:27:52 -0400
From:      Aryeh Friedman <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com>
To:        FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Petite Cloud, CBSD, Intellij
Message-ID:  <CAGBxaX=qoTRkUZ8Rc7AU3nv4+b0+ZQ0D1zr4OwMTAj7MSLnDUQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20200714151237.GA28670@mithril>
References:  <CAGBxaX=QvJqSycQJrq3RmFJ57E=ebSY6sG2BTXpUKBP5jpqw6g@mail.gmail.com> <8fcd60d7-1de1-82dc-d840-2555663ac153@gmail.com> <CAGBxaXn9tq6hbbNdjn_iqSiSr74exO1G-M9=eyP6YHykQ8QctA@mail.gmail.com> <bae2f4df-ec82-5beb-57ae-a07a5460a48a@gmail.com> <CAGBxaX=AuFx2fd0vwK0MTvSjvrrMZhNsG1TqecbFrAkqge96CA@mail.gmail.com> <20200714070831.f01a144e1dc808ebea421afe@sohara.org> <CAGBxaXmQ8zfqU+5kT1RAcQph4wfQ8mT8LKQC+S_J8eePyEpgQg@mail.gmail.com> <20200714104735.ceae71903e2f61bf401655ea@sohara.org> <8f96ee4e-2922-7850-6839-1c50a62094fe@gmail.com> <20200714153626.62ade8ec.freebsd@edvax.de> <20200714151237.GA28670@mithril>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 11:13 AM Jacques Foucry <jacques+freebsd@foucry.net>
wrote:

> > > Whew! I was afraid I'd managed to start a *real* flame war, one of
> those
> > > endless my-language/your-language pissing matches. :D
> >
> > Don't worry! Experienced programmers _know_ that you can write
> > crappy code in _every_ language - it's just the fact the some
> > languages encourage writing bad code more than others if the
> > programmer did not properly learn the language's elements and
> > its adjacent tools. :-)
>
> And others (like COBOL[1]) are strictly discourage bad/non reading code.
>

COBOL is the very definition of a language that encourages bad code
(assembly is the only one that is worse).   One of the worst offending
items is a construct (I forget the actual code) that boils down to goto
with a symbolic (and changeable at run time) goto.  The only thing worse
then this when keeping with the unconditional arbitrary instruction pointer
changing theme (aka "goto considered harmful") is a hypothetical construct
I have joked about I call "dynamic camefrom".   Camefrom says to go back to
the last location that executed a goto (think of it as an unstructured
return/break/continue that can be used between functions and outside of
loops).   The dynamic camefrom lets you at runtime symbolically specify how
many gotos to jump over when going back to where you came from (it is a seg
fault/core dump if you specify a number of gotos that is greater then the
number executed so far in the program or if it is negative).  The icing on
the cake would be a purely dynamically typed language that implies type by
first assignment (such as JavaShit) implementing dynamic camefroms.


-- 
Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAGBxaX=qoTRkUZ8Rc7AU3nv4+b0+ZQ0D1zr4OwMTAj7MSLnDUQ>