Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2011 03:12:36 -0800 From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Jarrod Slick <jarrod@e-sensibility.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, 839273@gmail.com Subject: Re: qmail or postfix? Message-ID: <86r5bqy9jv.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTik9SfKtyaaQDmYq%2B3tM8PPzMAH3x56tGiT8LtcY@mail.gmail.com> (Jarrod Slick's message of "Tue, 1 Feb 2011 20:56:35 -0700") References: <4D48197A.8000108@gmail.com> <AANLkTin5o1zRq-=V_k0r8bgT5ZH4Dc5qfdpZpUZTvFcy@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTik9SfKtyaaQDmYq%2B3tM8PPzMAH3x56tGiT8LtcY@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>>> "Jarrod" == Jarrod Slick <jarrod@e-sensibility.com> writes: Jarrod> If you know of any specific problems with postfix that would Jarrod> substantiate your claim I encourage you to inform the project's Jarrod> maintainers. In fact, given the legacy of other security tools created by the author of Postfix (Wietse Venema) (SATAN, TCP Wrappers, Coroner's Toolkit), I'd say that postfix was *also* designed from the start as a secure MTA. It certainly looks that way. I've met Wietse in person... he's an upstanding guy. -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 <merlyn@stonehenge.com> <URL:http://www.stonehenge.com/merlyn/>; Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86r5bqy9jv.fsf>