From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Oct 13 15:44:45 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D77E1154A4 for ; Wed, 13 Oct 1999 15:44:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by frmug.org (8.9.3/frmug-2.5/nospam) with UUCP id AAA23787 for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 00:44:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from roberto@keltia.freenix.fr) Received: by keltia.freenix.fr (Postfix, from userid 101) id 4D2A0885C; Thu, 14 Oct 1999 00:28:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 14 Oct 1999 00:28:43 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: --enable-haifa Message-ID: <19991014002843.A64703@keltia.freenix.fr> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org References: <199910130729.DAA05354@bellsouth.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii User-Agent: Mutt/1.0pre2i In-Reply-To: <199910130729.DAA05354@bellsouth.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT/ELF AMD-K6/200 & 2x PPro/200 SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG According to W Gerald Hicks: > Just curious what effect using the --enable-haifa flag for building > gcc-2.95.1/x86 would have so I did a comparison using the Dhrystone > benchmark from /usr/ports/benchmarks/bytebench. I think the Haifa scheduler is only really effective on pure RISC processors like the Alpha or PA-8000. I remember doing some tests with older versions of egcs and not seeing any significant changes... -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 4.0-CURRENT #74: Thu Sep 9 00:20:51 CEST 1999 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message