Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:22:50 +0800
From:      Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org>
To:        freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: your thoughts on a particualar ipfw action.
Message-ID:  <5ca6bec5-0cff-b9f0-8d1e-abc858e32703@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHu1Y72jggDjv1uCdS6SMez9nUEPVHvLZHkZP9vFu-VqA5SuGA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20160805024301.H56585@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <b4eb71be-9490-5c22-d22b-f6a1612e38d3@freebsd.org> <CAHu1Y72jggDjv1uCdS6SMez9nUEPVHvLZHkZP9vFu-VqA5SuGA@mail.gmail.com>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
On 5/08/2016 12:15 PM, Michael Sierchio wrote:
> Wouldn't it make sense to use the ISO Numeric Code / UN M49 Numerical Code?
actually it doesn't make sense. the source of data doesn't have that 
information in it
so it would require a whole layer of mapping, including downloads. and 
it would have to
cope with unexpected ambiguities and mismatches.





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5ca6bec5-0cff-b9f0-8d1e-abc858e32703>