Date: Sun, 06 May 2001 03:59:37 +0200 From: Roelof Osinga <roelof@eboa.com> To: Chris Dempsey <chris@luckyirish.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: VM? WAS Dual Boot Win2K with RAID 0 Message-ID: <3AF4B009.2D3B4912@eboa.com> References: <FEECIHKCNHGHPNCAFCBACEPLCAAA.chris@luckyirish.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chris Dempsey wrote: > > What is the performance hit running as a virtual machine? Some of the > software I run atop Win2K is pretty performance stressing (complicated > Photoshop, video editing). Depends on the architecture. How much emulation is involved. Believe there's a demo (time limited) available so you can judge for yourself if the penalty is right for the crime. Roelof PS another benefit would seem to me to be that one could get away with running Win95 or something in lieu of NT. Thereby saving on royalties whilest still benefitting from the stability gains of FreeBSD. -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- eBOAź est. 1982 tel. +31-58-2123014 web. http://eBOA.com/ fax. +31-58-2160293 mail info@eBOA.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3AF4B009.2D3B4912>