From owner-freebsd-current Sun Apr 18 12: 5: 9 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from ns.skylink.it (ns.skylink.it [194.177.113.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1365D14BF5 for ; Sun, 18 Apr 1999 12:05:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hibma@skylink.it) Received: from heidi.plazza.it ([194.185.55.84]) by ns.skylink.it (8.9.1/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA20338; Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:04:01 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost.plazza.it [127.0.0.1]) by heidi.plazza.it (8.8.8/8.8.5) with SMTP id VAA03280; Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:01:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 18 Apr 1999 21:01:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Nick Hibma X-Sender: n_hibma@heidi.plazza.it Reply-To: Nick Hibma To: Alex Zepeda Cc: "Daniel C. Sobral" , "Jordan K. Hubbard" , current Subject: Re: newbus and modem(s) In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Why would I say it wasn't ready? Because outside of core (apparently), > nobody was warned/told that this was going to be committed in a few > days/hours/minutes. The USB code has been using newbus for over 4 months now. And up to now we've had only one bug to fix. The rest was feature requests. I've ported the newconfig style USB code of NetBSD to FreeBSD and I really prefer the newbus style, because it is truly dynamic. Nick FreeBSD USB project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message