From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 17 23:01:16 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93C744B2; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:01:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (gatekeeper.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E38148FC14; Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:01:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alph.allbsd.org (p1137-ipbf1505funabasi.chiba.ocn.ne.jp [118.7.212.137]) (authenticated bits=128) by mail.allbsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAHN0qTZ088914 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:01:02 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.allbsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id qAHN0n9d050687; Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:00:51 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2012 07:43:25 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20121118.074325.564844639489846824.hrs@allbsd.org> To: utisoft@gmail.com Subject: Re: mountlate being too mount-happy From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: References: X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.5 on Emacs 23.4 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Sun_Nov_18_07_43_25_2012_412)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.4 at gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (mail.allbsd.org [133.31.130.32]); Sun, 18 Nov 2012 08:01:02 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.1 required=13.0 tests=CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, ONLY1HOPDIRECT,SAMEHELOBY2HOP,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on gatekeeper.allbsd.org Cc: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org, mjg@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2012 23:01:16 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Nov_18_07_43_25_2012_412)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Chris Rees wrote in : ut> On 2 November 2012 14:21, Eitan Adler wrote: ut> > On 2 November 2012 09:56, Chris Rees wrote: ut> >> I'll take a look. ut> > ut> > untested: ut> ut> Based on Eitan's patch, I've tested this one, and documented it in mount(8) too: ut> ut> http://www.bayofrum.net/~crees/patches/mountonlylate.diff ut> ut> Does anyone have any suggestions/objections/urge to approve it? Is the original problem due to backgrounding of NFS mount only? If so, implementing prevention of duplicate invocation into mount(8) would be more reasonable, I think. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Nov_18_07_43_25_2012_412)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAlCoEw0ACgkQTyzT2CeTzy3VHgCfcZOAyukTouSY+HC2ENs77QRe ZqMAn0jEPeTZ1zKC8vU29/jIfd1cao5Z =gDb9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Nov_18_07_43_25_2012_412)----