Date: Sat, 27 May 2006 13:12:37 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky <marck@rinet.ru> To: "Simon L. Nielsen" <simon@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-doc@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, doc-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: www/en/internal new-account.sgml Message-ID: <20060527131045.T82623@woozle.rinet.ru> In-Reply-To: <20060527090914.GB1065@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <200605261021.k4QALmRa046669@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060527125944.G82623@woozle.rinet.ru> <20060527090914.GB1065@zaphod.nitro.dk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 27 May 2006, Simon L. Nielsen wrote: SLN> > GS> - Change admins@ to accounts@, since the former is closed due to SLN> > GS> a lot of spam. SLN> > GS> - Do not use full form of accounts@ email address, to avoid spam SLN> > GS> harvesting of this address. SLN> > SLN> > What wonders me a bit is that I did not find any announcement for this even on SLN> > closed mailing list. SLN> SLN> It changed half a year or so ago after admins started getting 1000+ SLN> bounces a day. People writing admins will get a reply telling them SLN> where to direct their email. Ah, thanks for clarification. So, I suppose glebius@ apparently had to contact admins, got this reply and decided to document it somewhere ;-) However, doesn't this auto-reply provoke spammers to think admins@ is still workable mail address? Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060527131045.T82623>