Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Dec 2013 13:30:53 +0400
From:      Victor Gamov <vit@euro-comm.net>
To:        Sami Halabi <sodynet1@gmail.com>
Cc:        freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Netgraph ng_patch and ng_input: where to find packets?
Message-ID:  <D84A0C0F-F443-4AB9-B0FB-43D1D829EC29@euro-comm.net>
In-Reply-To: <CAEW%2BogYbzXfN=JB7ozYC686iR6vbNMwehVJ7vcJUT60cfNUkJw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <ED66CBAA-575E-4823-9AEE-4A44FEF6AB01@euro-comm.net> <5293E3E7.6090604@freebsd.org> <B2B699D8-0BD8-451F-8685-C7B8C56AA7F0@euro-comm.net> <F39CFDF7-0772-488D-9DB9-350AEC495884@euro-comm.net> <CAEW%2BogZNpqzxAYMArqa8jkb=O1OipKo9jYQ90iZq=0pxqPY=TQ@mail.gmail.com> <52A493F1.6040700@freebsd.org> <CAEW%2BogYbzXfN=JB7ozYC686iR6vbNMwehVJ7vcJUT60cfNUkJw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 09Dec, 2013, at 11:36, Sami Halabi wrote:

> Hi,

Hi Sami

> Actually following the ng_patch the following worked for me (using =
9.2-R -amd64):

Yes, ng_patch works fine for me too.  Then ng_input works too because I =
see patched packets at ipfw.  But this packets does not appears on =
outgoing interface.

Now I haven't machine for future testing, but I'll do more tests on =
upcoming 10.0-R because I want to use 10.0 for my project.


> kldload ng_patch
> kldload ng_ipfw
> /usr/sbin/ngctl -f- << SEQ
>                  mkpeer ipfw: patch 300 in
>                  name ipfw:300 src_dst_chg
>                  msg src_dst_chg: setconfig { count=3D2 csum_flags=3D1 =
ops=3D[         \
>                          { mode=3D1 value=3D0xc0a8e609 length=3D4 =
offset=3D12 }  \
>                          { mode=3D1 value=3D0xc0a8e680 length=3D4 =
offset=3D16 } ] }
>          SEQ
> /sbin/ipfw add 600 netgraph 300 log ip from any to 239.0.0.19 dst-port =
1234 in via vlan999
>=20
> Sami
>=20
>=20
> On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Julian Elischer <julian@freebsd.org> =
wrote:
> On 12/8/13, 6:43 PM, Sami Halabi wrote:
> Hi Gamov,
> Have got this to work?
> If so would share configurations?
>=20
> Thanks in advance,
> Sami
> =D7=91=D7=AA=D7=90=D7=A8=D7=99=D7=9A 29 =D7=91=D7=A0=D7=95=D7=91 2013 =
19:28, "Victor Gamov" <vit@euro-comm.net> =D7=9B=D7=AA=D7=91:
>=20
>=20
>=20
> if not then the way to track it it to put a breakpoint on the netgraph =
node that handles the packet and just single step through until you see =
where the packet goes..
> kdb would give you a decent idea but a second machine (or a virtual =
machine) with kgdb would really show you what's going on.

--
=D0=A1 =D1=83=D0=B2=D0=B0=D0=B6=D0=B5=D0=BD=D0=B8=D0=B5=D0=BC,
=D0=93=D0=B0=D0=BC=D0=BE=D0=B2 =D0=92=D0=B8=D0=BA=D1=82=D0=BE=D1=80








Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?D84A0C0F-F443-4AB9-B0FB-43D1D829EC29>