From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Oct 9 12:56:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55A379D197A for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CBCBE19 for ; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 12:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (mail.toco-domains.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 514361B22835; Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:56:36 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Commiter needed for PR 200652 To: =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=c3=bcsch?= , FreeBSD ports References: <5617B8E3.1070801@toco-domains.de> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <5617B984.2010002@toco-domains.de> Date: Fri, 9 Oct 2015 14:56:36 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <5617B8E3.1070801@toco-domains.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Oct 2015 12:56:39 -0000 On 09.10.2015 14:53, Torsten Zuehlsdorff wrote: > Hello, > >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=200652 >> >> It's glue to use the existing ports >> >> p5-CGI-ExtDirect >> p5-RPC-ExtDirect >> >> with plack environment. >> >> It's been open since June, so perhaps someone could take pity and >> commit it? :-D > > I'm not a committer, but i take a short look at it. I think you should > make a little more QA. > > First i see there is a PORTEPOCH. Since this is a new port, this line > should be there. There is a "not" missing ;) Greetings, Torsten