Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 02:01:57 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> To: Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: status of flash9/flash10 support in RELENG_7 ? Message-ID: <32688442@ipt.ru> In-Reply-To: <20090725105020.66e281ee@kan.dnsalias.net> (Alexander Kabaev's message of "Sat\, 25 Jul 2009 10\:50\:20 -0400") References: <20090725013500.GC62402@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725073805.GA11455@abigail.blackend.org> <20090725115525.GA85767@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <20090725123749.GA26505@abigail.blackend.org> <46928623@ipt.ru> <20090725105020.66e281ee@kan.dnsalias.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Rerouting from stable@ to emulation@ as it may be a serious matter. Alexander Kabaev <kabaev@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, 25 Jul 2009 17:36:00 +0400 > Boris Samorodov <bsam@ipt.ru> wrote: >> >> As for the original question. I don't use flash so can't be very >> helpful here. But there are reports at emulation@ ML that both >> linux-f8-flashplugin10 and linux-f10-flashplugin10 work better >> then flashplugin[7|9]. > > It does not work very well under Linux32 compat on -current - our futex > implementation seems to be too broken and causes frequent deadlock and > causes multiple threads to get stuck on process exit. One can easily > collect dozens of those stuck processes doing causal web browsing. Can anybody comment on this? Thanks! -- WBR, bsam
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32688442>