Date: 04 Jan 2003 05:16:56 +0100 From: Jukka Simila <home@jukkis.net> To: Mark <admin@asarian-host.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability Message-ID: <1041653815.7534.9.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200301030117.H031HZS41668@asarian-host.net> References: <200212170023.gBH0Nvlu000764@beast.csl.sri.com> <20030103000232.GA52181@blazingdot.com> <200301030117.H031HZS41668@asarian-host.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2003-01-03 at 02:17, Mark wrote: > > What is it that makes people rave about the longest uptime? To me, this is > just a list of sites whose admins have neglected to perform the necessary > upgrade-maintenances, seemingly for almost three years even. To me, this is > just a list of potentially vulnerable sites. > > - Mark And, those uptimes just say that FreeBSD was stable 3 years ago. I haven't seen FBSD 4.7 system with uptime > 1000 days, for quite obvious reasons.. Should I recommend everyone to install FBSD 2.2.8 since it has good uptime records? :) //Jukkis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1041653815.7534.9.camel>