Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 8 Jan 1998 04:52:11 +0300 (MSK)
From:      =?KOI8-R?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Cc:        Satoshi Asami <asami@cs.berkeley.edu>, ports@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org, jkh@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: tk80 port or tcl installation are broken on -current 
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980108044920.5834A-100000@lsd.relcom.eu.net>
In-Reply-To: <14994.884221928@time.cdrom.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 7 Jan 1998, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:

> Yes, I see the problem.  No, I see no immediate solution that doesn't
> have drawbacks of its own.  Yes, I hate this entire problem and would
> just as soon say  "heck, just nuke TCL out of the base OS" if I had
> a way of handling dist/ports dependencies currently in the tree.
> The fact that I don't is why so many people are complaining that the
> Handbook and FAQ have been left out of the doc dist since 2.2.2.

As far as I see at this moment (maybe not so deeply as needed), there is
only two things needed to fix this situation for -current.

1) Add --with-tcl=/usr/libdata/tcl to tk80 configure args
2) Install tclConfig.sh in /usr/libdata/tcl too from libtcl Makefile

I don't check but it looks like working thing at least.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
<ache@nietzsche.net>
http://www.nagual.pp.ru/~ache/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980108044920.5834A-100000>