From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Jul 17 19:47:42 2004
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AAF9716A4CE; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:47:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 5A64543D2D; Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:47:41 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa98708@salmon>; 17 Jul 2004 20:47:40 +0100 (BST)
Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 20:47:40 +0100
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: David Malone <dwmalone@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20040717194740.GA89030@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <200407171944.i6HJiDJM057563@repoman.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200407171944.i6HJiDJM057563@repoman.freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Sender: dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_syncache.c tcp_var.h
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 19:47:42 -0000

On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 07:44:13PM +0000, David Malone wrote:
> dwmalone    2004-07-17 19:44:13 UTC
> 
>   FreeBSD src repository
> 
>   Modified files:
>     sys/netinet          tcp_syncache.c tcp_var.h 

I forgot to mention, that on i386 this adds 4 bytes to the size of
a syncache entry (104->108). On amd64 it actually remains the same
size 'cos of padding in the syncache structure. Since nothing has
increased over a power-of-two boundry, I don't think this will
result in any problems.

	David.