From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 23 17:36:51 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE8BB16A401 for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out5.smtp.messagingengine.com (out5.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BE513C47E for ; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffrey@goldmark.org) Received: from out1.internal (unknown [10.202.2.149]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 039C71CFCD3; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:02:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from heartbeat1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by out1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:02:54 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: ha2AIFLLQQ6qyiT4tzA74TGloZRhJJ/ETpjr1i9c3i75 1172250172 Received: from [10.1.10.136] (n114.ewd.goldmark.org [72.64.118.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A227B700C; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 12:02:52 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <45DED5B6.9020309@t-hosting.hu> References: <45DED5B6.9020309@t-hosting.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: Jeffrey Goldberg Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:02:49 -0600 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.752.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Licensing question about GPL/LGPL binaries X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 17:36:52 -0000 [freebsd-emulation cut from cc] On Feb 23, 2007, at 5:53 AM, K=F6vesd=E1n G=E1bor wrote: > The question is that can we extract and provide these binaries in a =20= > simple tar.gz file or is that considered a GPL/LGPL violation? The =20 > sources are freely available on slackware.com, but we are not sure =20 > doing so is legally correct. What do you think about this? G=E1bor, What you plan to do is perfectly fine under the GPL as long as (1) What you distribute is under the GPL license (2) You let people know where they can freely get the source (3) You don't take credit for work that isn't yours. Szervusz, -j --=20 Jeffrey Goldberg http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/