Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 13:48:23 +0200 From: "Julian H. Stacey" <jhs@berklix.com> To: "Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Clean up old PRs Message-ID: <201105171148.p4HBmN09095104@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: Your message "Tue, 17 May 2011 01:49:10 BST." <20110517004910.GD94089@curry.linta.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Klaus, looks like you lost, so I restored: cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Reference: > From: "Klaus T. Aehlig" <aehlig@linta.de> > Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 01:49:10 +0100 > Message-id: <20110517004910.GD94089@curry.linta.de> "Klaus T. Aehlig" wrote: > > Hallo, > > > Might it be more useful be to somewhat redefine categories > > category f - feedback & > > category s - suspended > > [...] > > speaking of those categories, but slightly off-topic: is there a chance > to in some way automatically set PRs that have been set to "feedback, > awaiting maintainer's feedback" back to open, once the feedback arrived? > (E.g., my PRs ports/155469 and ports/155655 are still "feedback" despite > the maintainer's answer 8 weeks ago.) This might also be some form of > clean up. One could, e.g., use some heuristics, like a bug-follow-up > from the maintainer's email-address or something similar. > > Best, > Klaus
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201105171148.p4HBmN09095104>