Date: Sat, 08 Jul 2017 18:38:57 +0200 From: Matthew Rezny <rezny@freebsd.org> To: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Cc: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r445016 - in head/x11/libxshmfence: . files Message-ID: <2143330.zaZeaKsGN9@workstation.reztek> In-Reply-To: <20170708152816.GA96824@FreeBSD.org> References: <201707041347.v64Dlkx7028953@repo.freebsd.org> <4854339.z0ub1xhMfD@workstation.reztek> <20170708152816.GA96824@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Saturday 08 July 2017 15:28:16 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Sat, Jul 08, 2017 at 03:45:08PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote: > > [...] > > Regarding beignet specifically, that is one I bumped along but cannot > > test. > > I've been trying to pick up everything under the x11 umbrella because it > > wasn't being done otherwise, but my interests (Xorg and Mesa, for Radeon, > > pre-GPU > > ^^^^^^^ > Shall I read it as pre-GCN (I hope so, as this is my interest as well)? > Read "Radeon" as all GPUs with Radeon name. I have an assortment of hardware using R100, R200, R300, and R600 drivers, only missing radeonSI and amdgpu. Read "pre-GPU" to mean the stuff that worked with DRI1 but has almost completely fallen by the way side. I have an assortment of older cards that I'd like to restore proper support for, e.g. Matrox G200-G550, Rage128 (upstream devs have pondered DRI2 support as these are close to R100), Mach64 (I think I still have a working one), etc. > > are not as broad as the entire team needs to be; we could use more active > > members and/or offload some things that aren't really graphics, e.g. > > OpenCL. > I concur; I have a feeling that recent Mesa/DRI updates are tested primarily > on Intel's crappy^Whardware, often leaving AMD users with less tendance > (e.g. PR 220444, albeit I recall I got regular mplayer -vo xv broken on one > of the earlier Mesa/DRI updates as well). > The recent Mesa updates (those I've done) are better tested on Radeon than Intel though I lack recent AMD hardware. I don't test things I don't expect to work, e.g. VDPAU without drm-next. > Also: PR 214204, and the fact that drm-next does not work on my A8-5550M at > all (it hangs or reboots upon kldloading radeonkms -- cannot retest it right > now as I'm in the process of debugging some ACPI issues under Ubuntu). > I have the same issue with needing root but haven't dug too deep. I have no real OpenCL workloads to run but work be nice to see basic tests work. On my Radeon HD 6970, clinfo hangs and clpeak seems to sit forever doing nothing. > ./danfe
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2143330.zaZeaKsGN9>