Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:55:04 -0400
From:      Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To:        Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de>
Cc:        freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: problem with building /usr/ports/java/jdk16 in 'nohup' mode
Message-ID:  <44iqeedq9j.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
In-Reply-To: <20091016075650.GA2059@current.Sisis.de> (Matthias Apitz's message of "Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:56:50 %2B0200")
References:  <20091016075650.GA2059@current.Sisis.de>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> writes:

> Hello,
>
> If you build the port /usr/ports/java/jdk16 in 'nohup' mode it loops
> later in the question about the license:
>
> ===>  Extracting for jdk-1.6.0.3p4_12
> => MD5 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-src-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-src-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => MD5 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-bin-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for jdk-6u3-fcs-bin-b05-jrl-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => MD5 Checksum OK for
> jdk-6u3-fcs-mozilla_headers-b05-unix-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for
> jdk-6u3-fcs-mozilla_headers-b05-unix-24_sep_2007.jar.
> => MD5 Checksum OK for bsd-jdk16-patches-4.tar.bz2.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for bsd-jdk16-patches-4.tar.bz2.
> => MD5 Checksum OK for tzupdater-1_3_18-2009k.zip.
> => SHA256 Checksum OK for tzupdater-1_3_18-2009k.zip.
> ===>   jdk-1.6.0.3p4_12 depends on executable: unzip - found
> /bin/sh /usr/ports/java/jdk16/files/license.sh
> JAVA RESEARCH LICENSE
> Version 1.6
>
>
> I.    DEFINITIONS.
> ....
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
>
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
>
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
>
> Do you agree to the above license terms? [yes or no]
> ...
> until file syste is full :-(
>
> The script /usr/ports/java/jdk16/files/license.sh should be changed to
> check if STDIN is a terminal, and if not should assume 'yes'.

Because of the way the license is written, I think it would have to
assume 'no'.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44iqeedq9j.fsf>