From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Mar 3 13:33:35 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA29083 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 13:33:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA29078 for ; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 13:33:32 -0800 (PST) Received: (from henrich@localhost) by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.8.5/8.8.4) id QAA05177; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 16:33:22 -0500 (EST) From: Charles Henrich Message-Id: <199703032133.QAA05177@crh.cl.msu.edu> Subject: Re: freebsd.org vs vex.net To: scrappy@hub.org (The Hermit Hacker) Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 16:33:22 -0500 (EST) Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from The Hermit Hacker at "Mar 3, 97 05:27:49 pm" X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > I think that about the only way that a freebsd.org team would make > much of a dent is if it were officially endorsed by the core team, *and* > something similar to what the vex.net site has done as far as instructions > as well as monitoring... Well I was hoping the core would officially endorse it, and if you'll note a large number of the large sites are made of up FreeBSD folk anywho, who presumably would switch. -Crh Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@msu.edu http://pilot.msu.edu/~henrich