From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 23 23:02:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2786116A4CE; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 23:02:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from zaphod.nitro.dk (port324.ds1-khk.adsl.cybercity.dk [212.242.113.79]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A2343D1D; Sat, 23 Oct 2004 23:02:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from simon@zaphod.nitro.dk) Received: by zaphod.nitro.dk (Postfix, from userid 3000) id 0FB8C119B9; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:02:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 01:02:18 +0200 From: "Simon L. Nielsen" To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-ID: <20041023230218.GB771@zaphod.nitro.dk> References: <20041023210548.GA48606@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041023210548.GA48606@gothmog.gr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: does this require a manpage date bump? X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Oct 2004 23:02:21 -0000 --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2004.10.24 00:05:48 +0300, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > Does a minor change like the following require a manpage date bump? > > %%% > --- du.1.orig 2 Jul 2004 22:22:23 -0000 1.28 > +++ du.1 23 Oct 2004 21:02:35 -0000 > @@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ > .It Fl h > "Human-readable" output. > Use unit suffixes: Byte, Kilobyte, Megabyte, > -Gigabyte, Terabyte and Petabyte > +Gigabyte, Terabyte and Petabyte. > .It Fl r > Generate messages about directories that cannot be read, files > that cannot be opened, and so on. > %%% No, according to Ruslan it should only be done if there is actual content change. Of course it comes down to a judgment call, but in this case I think you can safely skip the bump. If not, Ruslan will probably tell you post-commit :-). --=20 Simon L. Nielsen FreeBSD Documentation Team --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBeuL6h9pcDSc1mlERAjMPAJ0T3RvqKFHAu+ncrvlcE2gnKtf/+gCgkFNZ xwoLrxt5aeAdoC9w3TWTm5M= =0RgT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--