From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 3 06:17:21 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA27845 for questions-outgoing; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 06:17:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from darius.concentric.net (darius.concentric.net [207.155.184.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA27840 for ; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 06:17:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newman.concentric.net (newman [207.155.184.71]) by darius.concentric.net (8.8.5/(97/05/21 3.30)) id JAA15868; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 09:17:17 -0400 (EDT) [1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network] Received: from athena (ts001d22.sal-ut.concentric.net [206.173.156.34]) by newman.concentric.net (8.8.5) id JAA28288; Tue, 3 Jun 1997 09:17:06 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <3394190C.9E3CBA40@concentric.net> Date: Tue, 03 Jun 1997 07:15:56 -0600 From: Joshua Fielden Organization: Shaggy Enterprises X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.0b5 [en] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CD-ROM X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Scott Rothgaber wrote: > > On Mon, 2 Jun 1997, Nathan Schuler wrote: > > > First hint, avoid Linux. Linux is OK, but for serious use it is just not > > acceptable at all. > > This is a little strong. I know of at least one ISP that is all-Linux. > > But, even though it can do everything BSDI can do, it will take a lot of > work to get it as secure (shadowing, etc.) as BSDI. Of the two, BSDI is > the better choice for a commercial situation. AFAIK, Red Hat 4.0 has got shadowing..... JF