Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 09:25:38 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov <vas@mpeks.tomsk.su> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mutual forwarders in ISC BIND Message-ID: <20111229022538.GA38514@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20111228175512.GB27286@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20111228075422.GA18064@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4EFAE80D.9040900@my.gd> <20111228130734.GA23763@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4EFB1B4F.2090504@my.gd> <CAE_wXn2qKfQg_Od=VfX63TcvDSRFEz2ZLCDZDs71QjP2604QOQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAE_wXn1DzpxhhN_ASF%2B-LuxRBsdfgA8Se3ydhAgeJs5p53=VPg@mail.gmail.com> <20111228175512.GB27286@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Victor Sudakov wrote: > > > Victor, we researched this topic and learned that response time highly > > depends on distance between user and resolver, while cache influence > > on this value is lesser. > > So I advice you to keep all as is. > > Be it so. Thank you. And the reason for the whole thread. One of the customers told me that 8.8.8.8 is faster than our own DNS servers which are located on the same 100 MBit/s LAN with them. I was shocked but it seems true, at least for the answers which are not yet cached. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111229022538.GA38514>