From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jun 19 04:51:14 2012
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82FDE106566C
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 04:51:14 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.99])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA85D8FC0A
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 04:51:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q5J4p0Sg002034;
	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 06:51:00 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost)
	by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) with ESMTP id
	q5J4p08u002031; Tue, 19 Jun 2012 06:51:00 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl)
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 06:51:00 +0200 (CEST)
From: Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To: Chad Perrin <perrin@apotheon.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120618210049.GA2508@hemlock.hydra>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1206190649170.1823@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
References: <201206182014.q5IKEVdQ014212@mail.r-bonomi.com>
	<alpine.BSF.2.00.1206182228220.88997@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
	<20120618210049.GA2508@hemlock.hydra>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7
	(wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [127.0.0.1]);
	Tue, 19 Jun 2012 06:51:01 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Why Clang
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 04:51:14 -0000

>> be more exact.
>
> I believe Robert Bonomi (you didn't include attribution for the previous
> email, I notice) *was* more exact, in that the rest of his email
> explained what he thought of your glossing over the various factors that
> might contribute to binary size.
>
> I notice you ignored most of it in your response, too.

or maybe missed. So please tell me finally what is wrong in measuring 
speed by measuring time of execution doing same things?
What i should measure? time in heavens?


> I can generally puzzle out what caused various GCC warning and error
> messages when trying to compile my own code, given comparison of what's

strange but i don't have a problem - and i always set -Wall when using gcc 
as 99% of warnings are actually errors.