From owner-cvs-all  Sun Oct 28 21:25:40 2001
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from t-mta4.odn.ne.jp (mfep4.odn.ne.jp [143.90.131.182])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3C84037B405; Sun, 28 Oct 2001 21:25:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from artemis.emerald.priv.net ([211.121.221.129])
          by t-mta4.odn.ne.jp with ESMTP
          id <20011029052531119.WXPN.7028.t-mta4.odn.ne.jp@mta4.odn.ne.jp>;
          Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:25:31 +0900
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 14:25:48 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20011029.142548.06934931.shige@FreeBSD.org>
To: will@physics.purdue.edu
Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, jdp@FreeBSD.org, sf@FreeBSD.org,
	cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors Makefile ports/editors/emacs21
 Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist
 ports/editors/emacs21/files patch-configure.in patch-lib-src:Makefile.in
 patch-man:Makefile.in
From: Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <20011024150015.Q25747@squall.waterspout.com>
References: <86lmi217le.wl@gray.plala.or.jp>
	<20011025.023157.35100811.shige@FreeBSD.org>
	<20011024150015.Q25747@squall.waterspout.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.0 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <cvs-all.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20cvs-all>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20cvs-all>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

From: Will Andrews <will@physics.purdue.edu>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/editors Makefile ports/editors/emacs21 Makefile distinfo pkg-comment pkg-descr pkg-message pkg-plist ports/editors/emacs21/files patch-configure.in patch-lib-src:Makefile.in patch-man:Makefile.in
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2001 15:00:15 -0500

> Yes, we do need the history.  Unfortunately, there is nothing
> that can be done about it at this point except for you to pick a
> different name for the emacs 21 ports.

After a discussion at ports-jp ML, the following idea(plan) is suggested.

 emacs-19.x port -> obsolete [If required, editors/emacs19]
 emacs-20.x port -> editors/emacs(-stable?)
 emacs-21.x port -> editors/emacs-devel

 1. we only use portname with (major-)version as an obsolete version port.

 2. -stable and -devel ports have its own history.
    Do not repo-copy from -devel to -stable, and vice versa.

 3. When major-version shifting, for example,
      Before: editors/emacs(-stable)   (for emacs-20.x)
              editors/emacs-devel      (for emacs-21.x)
      After:  editors/emacs(-stable)   (for emacs-21.x)
              editors/emacs-devel      (for emacs-22.x)
    we only apply diffs between editors/emacs20 and editors/emacs-devel
    to editors/emacs port.

 4. After the above major-version shifting,
    if we want to leave a port for emacs-20.x,
    do repo-copy portname with major-version.
    For exmaple,
      Before: editors/emacs(-stable)   (for emacs-20.x)
              editors/emacs-devel      (for emacs-21.x)
      After:  editors/emacs20          (for emacs-20.x)
              editors/emacs(-stable)   (for emacs-21.x)
              editors/emacs-devel      (for emacs-22.x)

How about this?

--- shige
Shigeyuki Fukushima <shige@FreeBSD.org>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message