From owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Sat Sep 23 00:04:07 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arm@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F6BDE16892 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 00:04:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from mail.lariat.net (mail.lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14ACC83870 for ; Sat, 23 Sep 2017 00:04:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brett@lariat.net) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA22590; Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:04:02 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <201709230004.SAA22590@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 22 Sep 2017 18:03:59 -0600 To: Russell Haley From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: ARM board recommendations with true GigE ports Cc: freebsd-arm In-Reply-To: References: <201709222206.QAA21968@mail.lariat.net> <07D27DD7-2434-4A2E-91CE-A05D12BBAC2A@netgate.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Sep 2017 00:04:07 -0000 At 05:47 PM 9/22/2017, you wrote: >We make a custom product based on the Armada 38xx and it was measured >at high 900 Mbps using a Buildroot Linux. I want to say 980 but the >engineer who did the measurements is away so I can't confirm. So, if this is a recommended SoC for network-related applications, what commercial boards that use it are recommended? And is there driver support for them in FreeBSD? --Brett Glass